ASSEMBLY RIO DE LA PLATA BASIN INTERNATIONAL, dealt another blow to the mega-enterprises PROPERTY AS COLONY PARK SA.
Those responsible are desperate Colony Park SA (photo) panic is reflected in their faces, yesterday Dr. EDUARDO ANTONIO Merola, attorney for the ASSOCIATION IN DEFENCE OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE , trying remedy the error made by Dr. and Mrs. Judge Caparelli by the Civil and Commercial Court No. 11 of San Isidro, was found in the car styled "ASSOCIATION IN DEFENCE OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE C / COLONY PARK SA S / REGULAR" Expte. No. 68660, and respectfully said:
1 .- Through this writing and for reasons that are developed here, my part is to account for the failure of the defendant COLONY PARK SA to the obligations it assumed in the settlement agreement and order is ordered to rebuild the property under the conditions that had become operational at the time of the injunction.
2 .- I ask that the exposed application is ordered by a declaration of pure law of those claims Once all the criticisms made here are already accredited by convincing proofs issued by the Coast Guard and the Federal Justice, as will indicate.
3 .- As shown in the accompanying documentary and other evidence to prove such compliance is offered, the defendant has violated COLONY PARK SA in a systematic and intentional, the prohibition of any new work in undertaking subject to this process, which remains in force the injunction issued in this matter dated 19.08.2009 (pages 55/55vta.) that, until it has the necessary and after EIS could not perform any work for construction of gated community that seeks to build on the Parana River delta and called COLONY PARK ISLAND, limitándosele the power to do something, only those minimal maintenance and conservation.
But did the opposite: construction continued at a point that many of them and were shaped with the central features of the project.
4 .- It is noteworthy that the agreement approved by VS while refulado authorized the completion of dredging and filling, in order to clarify the scope of the consent, expressed in the minutes of hearing held on 19/02 / 2010 "without any of these tasks means construction progress and tasks edilicias "
But COLONY PARK SA was contrary to their fundamental obligation, he spent the entire period from February 2010 to the present, to advance the substantive tasks designed to realize the venture, with total disregard for its commitments and the scope of the approval given by the agreement VS.
In other words, bet on the policy of "fait accompli", taking advantage of the lack of permanent control in space as it seeks to build a great real estate business, with total disregard for the environment.
5 .- It is significant to highlight that this action unconscionable, not only is a violation of a court order, but persists in moving forward with construction projects affecting the environment, without the prior and necessary Environmental Impact Statement required by art. 5 inc. b) and provisions cctes. provincial law and regulations 11723 and 11 cctes. 25675 national law.
6 .- In addition to this core in order to breach its main obligations, arguably COLONY PARK SA has also been sluggish and lax in their commitment to properly arrange the collection of the Environmental Impact Statement and keep the Court of progress in this regard. It arises from the simple display this cause.
Obviously this lack of progress in the process is closely linked to that if they did would face insurmountable objections to proceed in such efforts. Conclusion: the more you delay it, the better to continue specifying illegalities.
photo December 14. 2010 (Mr. Director Architect Nestor Rubén Gil of SAyDSN Conners, Daniel Martinez Architect Chief Building Colony Park SA and Mr. Custody Officer Colony Park SA desperate) For the failure shown here makes it necessary to transform our understanding of the caution in the decommissioning NO POSSIBILITY ENDEAVOR ACCESS TO ANY PERSON IS NOT SHOWING AUTHORIZATION VS, instructing the Coast Guard Argentina to take appropriate measures to achieve compliance with that court order, informing the organized VS respect with any precision (sites control, number of staff, hours allocated, etc)
It ordered the closure of the venture, under the terms stated in Chapter IX, so that coincides with the decision in this regard by the Federal Judge Criminal and No. 1 San Isidro . Want
VS provide compliance, JUSTICE WILL
0 comments:
Post a Comment